licensing - A license free for free software but a fee for commercial software? -
licensing - A license free for free software but a fee for commercial software? -
i looking license allows developers release software freely/non-commercially utilize software without cost, releases commercial software needs purchase license. i've been looking @ gnu licenses seem free both commercial , non-commercial use.
what commonly used licenses in case?
there can no general reply question, either creating own software license (which can not free in the free software definition because restrict commercial use) or can seek accomplish similar dual licensing following:
the public , freely available software available under free software license strong copyleft gnu affero general public license (agpl). entity making utilize of software must publish source , changes it's users under same license (reciprocal, asp loophole closed).
you can create software practicable incompatible open source software choosing open software license (osl). it's incompatible in sense of existing open source software (first hand gpl covers largest share of open source code, many others) , has strong copyleft usage (communication of work even), it's pretty limiting.
you signal: don't utilize free version - morally questionable move.
as (and if) not fitting type of commercial utilize inquire about, can offer sec license commercial use. if complains can tell them, hey it's free software. bad move, working. inquire lawyer details, variant might not you're looking for, won't free software community favor.
instead need find out want do. restrict commercial utilize or not. after you've done that, talk lawyer create fitting software license work.
licensing
Comments
Post a Comment